ABSTRACT
[...]standing on the crest of yet another wave of change, driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning,2 pathology educators may soon be challenged to convey the best ways to apply these tools to the problems of diagnostic pathology for the coming generation of learners and the present corps of practitioners.3 Hence, this collaborative effort aims to describe the genetic code governing the transmission of pathology knowledge to subsequent generations of medical professionals.4 We aim to expose not just the code but also the supporting array of catalysts, enhancers, and other cofactors now in place to ensure we have a robust and potent supply of pathologists. APPLYING DP IN UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL, DENTAL, VETERINARY, AND ALLIED HEALTH EDUCATION Beginning in 1985, this technology has been progressively more widely implemented in undergraduate medical, dental, veterinary, and allied health (nursing, pharmacy, medical technology, etc) education platforms in the United States and internationally.5,11-26 As noted above, virtual microscopy laboratories, available on personal devices or in school-based computer labs, have replaced fixed laboratories housing gross specimens, boxes of glass slides, and student microscopes. WSI with links to supplementary resources, such as gross and radiologic images and additional study material, provide enrichment for the teaching and learning experience in the new virtual environment. [...]significant exposure to microanatomy and the laboratory methods of pathology underpinning so much of diagnosis, therapy, and management is foundational.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in persistent interstitial lung disease (ILD) following resolution of acute COVID-19. No studies have yet reported findings in surgical lung biopsies (SLB) from this patient population. METHODS: Our Michigan Medicine pathology database was queried for SLB reviewed between January 2020 and April 2021 from patients with persistent ILD following recovery from acute COVID-19. Slides for our retrospective observational study were independently reviewed by two thoracic pathologists, who were blinded to patient clinical data, radiographic findings, and previous pathologic diagnosis. FINDINGS: Eighteen cases met inclusion criteria. Of these, nine had usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). These included two patients with superimposed acute lung injury (ALI). Five cases showed a spectrum of ALI that ranged from persistent diffuse alveolar damage to organizing pneumonia. Four patients had desquamative interstitial pneumonia (1), acute and organizing bronchopneumonia (1), or no diagnostic abnormality (2). Compared to patients without UIP, those with UIP tended to be older and have pre-existing lung disease prior to COVID-19. In patients with UIP, pre-SLB chest computed tomography changes included groundglass with interstitial thickening or peripheral reticulations with bronchiectasis; no UIP patients had groundglass only. The most common radiographic finding in patients without UIP was groundglass opacities only. INTERPRETATION: UIP was the most common pathologic finding in patients undergoing evaluation for post-COVID-19 ILD. Our preliminary data suggests that CT changes described as interstitial thickening, peripheral reticulations, and/or bronchiectasis may be helpful in identifying patients with underlying fibrotic chronic interstitial pneumonia for which UIP is the chief concern. FUNDING: No intramural or extramural funding sources supported this work.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) is a ubiquitous finding in inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related deaths, but recent reports have also described additional atypical findings, including vascular changes. An aim of this study was to assess lung autopsy findings in COVID-19 inpatients, and in untreated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive individuals who died in the community, in order to understand the relative impact of medical intervention on lung histology. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 represents a unique histological variant of DAD by comparing the pathological findings with those of uninfected control patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lung sections from autopsy cases were reviewed by three pulmonary pathologists, including two who were blinded to patient cohort. The cohorts included four COVID-19 inpatients, four cases with postmortem SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses who died in the community, and eight SARS-CoV-2-negative control cases. DAD was present in all but one SARS-CoV-2-positive patient, who was asymptomatic and died in the community. Although SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were noted to have more focal perivascular inflammation/endothelialitis than control patients, there were no significant differences in the presence of hyaline membranes, fibrin thrombi, airspace organisation, and 'acute fibrinous and organising pneumonia'-like intra-alveolar fibrin deposition between the cohorts. Fibrinoid vessel wall necrosis, haemorrhage and capillaritis were not features of COVID-19-related DAD. CONCLUSIONS: DAD is the primary histological manifestation of severe lung disease in COVID-19 patients who die both in hospital and in the community, suggesting no contribution of hyperoxaemic mechanical ventilation to the histological changes. There are no distinctive morphological features with which to confidently differentiate COVID-19-related DAD from DAD due to other causes.